Archives
Categories
- Academia (51)
- artificial intelligence (20)
- Big data (54)
- cfp (4)
- Conference (44)
- Data Mining (104)
- Data science (52)
- General (35)
- Industry (1)
- Interview (1)
- Machine Learning (3)
- Mathematics (2)
- open-source (9)
- Pattern Mining (20)
- Plagiarism (6)
- Programming (16)
- Research (88)
- Time series (2)
- Uncategorized (14)
- Utility Mining (7)
- Video (10)
- Website (1)
-
Recent Posts
- If I would do a PhD again, what would I do differently?
- Analyzing COVID-19 tweets to understand the public opinion
- Discovering Alarm Correlation Rules for Network Fault Management (video)
- Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
- Conference Badges: the Best and the Worst
- Real Conferences VS Virtual Conferences
- The 10 most cited papers in our “Data Science and Pattern Recognition” journal!
- How to prepare your thesis defense?
- A Brief Report about the IEEE ICDM 2020 Conference
- Is it a good to change research area?
Recent Comments
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on Big problem on my website on IONOS webhosting!
- Brendan Vail on Big problem on my website on IONOS webhosting!
- Report about the ICGEC 2018 conference | The Data Mining Blog on An introduction to periodic pattern mining
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on How to answer reviewers for a journal paper revision?
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on Six important skills to become a succesful researcher
Tag cloud
- academia
- ai
- algorithm
- algorithms
- article
- articles
- artificial intelligence
- asia
- big data
- china
- conference
- data
- data mining
- data science
- frequent pattern mining
- frequent patterns
- high-utility mining
- high utility itemset mining
- icdm
- ieaaie
- itemset mining
- java
- journal
- machine learning
- open-source
- pakdd
- paper
- papers
- pattern mining
- periodic pattern
- phd
- plagiarism
- programming
- Research
- researcher
- research paper
- review
- reviewer
- sequence
- software
- spmf
- utility mining
- video
- workshop
- writing
Number of visitors:
1,938,054
Tag Archives: reviewer
Unethical Reviewers in Academia!
In this blog post, I will talk about a common problem in academia, which is the unethical behavior of some reviewers that ask authors to cite several of their papers. It is quite common that some reviewer will ask authors to cite his papers to increase his citation count. I have encountered this problem many times … Continue reading
Unethical reviewers in academia
In this blog post, I will discuss about the importance of an ethical review process in academia, and the problem of unethical reviewers. I will share some stories about some unethical reviewers in journals and conferences. Peer review in academia The process of peer review in academia … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Research
Tagged academia, ethics, peer review, Research, review, reviewer
Leave a comment
How to review a research paper?
Today, I will discuss the task of reviewing papers in academia. I will discuss why it is important to review papers, and then give tips about how to review papers and also talk about what a reviewer should do and should not do. This topic is important … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Research
Tagged article, journal article, research paper, review, reviewer
Leave a comment
Conference reviewers procrastinate?
Today, I will write about the work of reviewers for scientific conferences. As you probably know, when a researcher submit a paper to a conference, the paper is assigned to usually three or more reviewers. The program chair of the … Continue reading