Archives
Categories
- Academia (42)
- artificial intelligence (17)
- Big data (51)
- cfp (3)
- Conference (40)
- Data Mining (100)
- Data science (49)
- General (29)
- Industry (1)
- Interview (1)
- Mathematics (2)
- open-source (9)
- Pattern Mining (20)
- Plagiarism (6)
- Programming (16)
- Research (83)
- Time series (2)
- Uncategorized (14)
- Utility Mining (7)
- Video (9)
- Website (1)
-
Recent Posts
- CFP: IKEDS 2021 @ IEA AIE 2021 – Special Session on Intelligent Knowledge Engineering in Decision Making
- (video) Top-K Cross-Level High Utility Itemset Mining
- CFP about “AI in healthcare” (AIH2021 @ IEA AIE 2021)
- More problems on IONOS web hosting… 4 days of downtime!
- A brief report about the IEA AIE 2020 conference
- The Upcoming 3rd Utility Mining and Learning Workshop (UDML 2020!) at IEEE ICDM 2020
- The Imposter Syndrome in Academia
- Big problem on my website on IONOS webhosting!
- Unethical Reviewers in Academia!
- How to Improve Work Efficiency for Researchers?
Recent Comments
- Anjs on How to answer reviewers for a journal paper revision?
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on How to answer reviewers for a journal paper revision?
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on Six important skills to become a succesful researcher
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on About the author
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on How to make good looking charts for research papers?
Tag cloud
- academia
- ai
- algorithm
- algorithms
- article
- articles
- artificial intelligence
- asia
- big data
- china
- conference
- data
- data mining
- data science
- frequent pattern mining
- frequent patterns
- high-utility mining
- high utility itemset mining
- ieaaie
- itemset mining
- java
- journal
- machine learning
- open-source
- pakdd
- paper
- papers
- pattern mining
- periodic pattern
- plagiarism
- programming
- Research
- researcher
- research paper
- research papers
- review
- reviewer
- sequence
- software
- source code
- spmf
- utility mining
- video
- workshop
- writing
Number of visitors:
1918337
Tag Archives: review
Unethical Reviewers in Academia!
In this blog post, I will talk about a common problem in academia, which is the unethical behavior of some reviewers that ask authors to cite several of their papers. It is quite common that some reviewer will ask authors to cite his papers to increase his citation count. I have encountered this problem many times … Continue reading
Unethical reviewers in academia
In this blog post, I will discuss about the importance of an ethical review process in academia, and the problem of unethical reviewers. I will share some stories about some unethical reviewers in journals and conferences. Peer review in academia The process of peer review in academia … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Research
Tagged academia, ethics, peer review, Research, review, reviewer
Leave a comment
The review speed of academic journals
Today, I will talk about the review speed of academic journals. Review speed is an important criterion for selecting a journal to submit a paper when researchers face time constraints. For example, it is common that some students need to publish a paper quickly … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, artificial intelligence, Data Mining, Research
Tagged academic journal, journal, peer-review, review
Leave a comment
How to review a research paper?
Today, I will discuss the task of reviewing papers in academia. I will discuss why it is important to review papers, and then give tips about how to review papers and also talk about what a reviewer should do and should not do. This topic is important … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Research
Tagged article, journal article, research paper, review, reviewer
Leave a comment
Conference reviewers procrastinate?
Today, I will write about the work of reviewers for scientific conferences. As you probably know, when a researcher submit a paper to a conference, the paper is assigned to usually three or more reviewers. The program chair of the … Continue reading