Archives
Categories
- Academia (92)
- artificial intelligence (35)
- Big data (83)
- Bioinformatics (7)
- cfp (13)
- China (1)
- Chinese posts (1)
- Conference (78)
- Data Mining (190)
- Data science (107)
- Database (2)
- General (43)
- Industry (2)
- Java (13)
- Latex (12)
- Machine Learning (22)
- Mathematics (2)
- open-source (44)
- Other (4)
- Pattern Mining (95)
- Plagiarism (1)
- Programming (17)
- Research (108)
- spmf (67)
- Time series (3)
- Uncategorized (30)
- Utility Mining (23)
- Video (19)
- Website (6)
-
Recent Posts
- Upcoming feature of SPMF 2.66 : Visual Pattern Viewer
- Improved Visual Pattern Viewer with Pagination in SPMF 2.66
- Improved user interface in SPMF v.2.66 (part 2)
- Improved user interface in SPMF 2.66
- Academic genealogy
- An EXE version of SPMF for Windows
- A First Release of SPMF-Server and SPMF-Server Clients
- CFP: Special session at SOMET 2026
- SPMF 2.65 is released!
- The Item-Itemset Matrix Viewer: a new feature in SPMF 2.65 (to be released)
Recent Comments
-
-
Tag cloud
- academia
- ai
- algorithm
- apriori
- article
- artificial intelligence
- association rule
- big data
- cfp
- china
- conference
- data
- data mining
- data science
- episode
- graph
- high utility itemset mining
- icdm
- itemset
- itemset mining
- java
- journal
- latex
- machine learning
- open-source
- open source
- pakdd
- paper
- papers
- pattern
- pattern mining
- periodic pattern
- phd
- Research
- researcher
- reviewer
- sequence
- sequential pattern
- software
- spmf
- udml
- utility mining
- video
- workshop
- writing
Number of visitors:
2,796,200
Tag Archives: bad reviewer
How to deal with unethical reviewers? The good example of the EAAI journal
Today, I will talk about a problem that has been plaguing many academic journals in recent years. It is that several unethical reviewers are asking authors to cite several of their papers to boost their citation count. I previous wrote … Continue reading
Posted in Academia
Tagged academia, bad reviewer, cheating, citation, citation count, editor, journal, reviewer, unethical editor, unethical reviewer
Leave a comment