Archives
Categories
- Academia (85)
- artificial intelligence (34)
- Big data (82)
- Bioinformatics (3)
- cfp (10)
- Chinese posts (1)
- Conference (74)
- Data Mining (184)
- Data science (103)
- Database (2)
- General (43)
- Industry (2)
- Java (11)
- Latex (10)
- Machine Learning (20)
- Mathematics (2)
- open-source (39)
- Other (3)
- Pattern Mining (86)
- Plagiarism (1)
- Programming (17)
- Research (109)
- spmf (55)
- Time series (3)
- Uncategorized (23)
- Utility Mining (23)
- Video (19)
- Website (4)
-
Recent Posts
- Reducing the cost of web hosting…
- SPMF 2.62 is released!
- My research is open-source
- Two new shopping datasets with taxonomy
- How to deal with unethical reviewers? The good example of the EAAI journal
- CSRankings: still a biased ranking
- The story of the most influential paper award of PAKDD 2024
- A brief report about PAKDD 2024
- Report on the UDML 2024 workshop @ PAKDD 2024
- Upcoming SPMF features for v.2.62 – More Dataset Stats Tools
Recent Comments
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on A simple BAT script to unzip ZIP files in all sub-directories and then delete the ZIP files
- hamjii on A simple BAT script to unzip ZIP files in all sub-directories and then delete the ZIP files
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on How to call SPMF from R?
- Toni Garcia on How to call SPMF from R?
- K. P. Birla on About the author
Tag cloud
- academia
- ai
- algorithm
- apriori
- article
- articles
- artificial intelligence
- association rule
- big data
- cfp
- china
- conference
- data
- data mining
- data science
- episode
- graph
- high utility itemset mining
- icdm
- itemset
- itemset mining
- java
- journal
- latex
- machine learning
- open-source
- open source
- pakdd
- paper
- papers
- pattern mining
- periodic pattern
- phd
- Research
- researcher
- reviewer
- sequence
- sequential pattern
- software
- spmf
- udml
- utility mining
- video
- workshop
- writing
Number of visitors:
2,300,804
Tag Archives: reviews
Unethical reviewers in academia (part 3)
Previously, I wrote two blog posts about unethical reviewers in academia (part 1 and part 2). It is not that I like this topic, but today, I will talk again about that. Why? Because, I keep encountering them, unfortunately. It … Continue reading
Posted in Academia
Tagged journal, peer review, review process, reviews, unethical reviewers
Leave a comment
The problem with Short Papers
Today, I will talk briefly about short papers at academic conferences, and the problems that they create (in my opinion). For those who don’t know, several conferences can reject or accept papers as short or full papers. A short paper … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Research
Tagged academia, papers, publisher, research papaers, reviews, short papers
Leave a comment