Archives
Categories
- Academia (81)
- artificial intelligence (34)
- Big data (80)
- Bioinformatics (3)
- cfp (10)
- Chinese posts (1)
- Conference (70)
- Data Mining (179)
- Data science (100)
- Database (1)
- General (42)
- Industry (2)
- Interview (1)
- Java (10)
- Latex (10)
- Machine Learning (20)
- Mathematics (2)
- open-source (36)
- Other (3)
- Pattern Mining (82)
- Programming (17)
- Research (109)
- spmf (48)
- Time series (3)
- Uncategorized (22)
- Utility Mining (22)
- Video (19)
- Website (3)
-
Recent Posts
- When ChatGPT is used to write papers…
- Sneak peak at the new user interface of SPMF (part 2)
- Sneak peak at the new user interface of SPMF (part 1)
- UDML 2024 Accepted papers
- SPMF 2.60 is coming soon!
- The importance of using standard terminology in research papers
- UDML 2024 @ PAKDD 2024 (deadline extended)
- Your social network on DBLP as a graph
- Call for papers: UDML 2024 workshop @ PAKDD 2024
- A new survey paper on episode mining!
Recent Comments
- Dr J Gangadhar Naik on How to improve the quality of your research papers?
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on About the author
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on About the author
- K. P. Birla on About the author
- Himanshi on Discovering hidden patterns in texts using SPMF
DSSBA2023
Tag cloud
- academia
- ai
- algorithm
- apriori
- article
- articles
- artificial intelligence
- association rule
- big data
- cfp
- china
- conference
- data
- data mining
- data science
- episode
- graph
- high utility itemset mining
- icdm
- itemset
- itemset mining
- java
- journal
- latex
- machine learning
- open-source
- open source
- pakdd
- paper
- papers
- pattern mining
- periodic pattern
- phd
- Research
- researcher
- reviewer
- sequence
- sequential pattern
- software
- spmf
- udml
- utility mining
- video
- workshop
- writing
Number of visitors:
2,273,704
Tag Archives: reviews
Unethical reviewers in academia (part 3)
Previously, I wrote two blog posts about unethical reviewers in academia (part 1 and part 2). It is not that I like this topic, but today, I will talk again about that. Why? Because, I keep encountering them, unfortunately. It … Continue reading
Posted in Academia
Tagged journal, peer review, review process, reviews, unethical reviewers
Leave a comment
The problem with Short Papers
Today, I will talk briefly about short papers at academic conferences, and the problems that they create (in my opinion). For those who don’t know, several conferences can reject or accept papers as short or full papers. A short paper … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Research
Tagged academia, papers, publisher, research papaers, reviews, short papers
Leave a comment