Archives
Categories
- Academia (92)
- artificial intelligence (36)
- Big data (83)
- Bioinformatics (8)
- cfp (15)
- China (1)
- Chinese posts (1)
- Conference (79)
- Data Mining (191)
- Data science (107)
- Database (2)
- General (43)
- Industry (2)
- Java (13)
- Latex (12)
- Machine Learning (22)
- Mathematics (2)
- open-source (46)
- Other (4)
- Pattern Mining (97)
- Plagiarism (1)
- Programming (17)
- Research (108)
- spmf (69)
- Time series (3)
- Uncategorized (30)
- Utility Mining (23)
- Video (19)
- Website (6)
-
Recent Posts
- CFP: Special issue on Energy-aware Artificial Intelligence
- Performance of Java vs Python for Sequential Pattern Mining (CM-SPAM)
- SPMF v2.66 is released
- Two upcoming workshops on bioinformatics and machine learning / pattern mining
- Upcoming SPMF 2.66 feature: Improved Workflow Editor
- Upcoming feature of SPMF 2.66 : Visual Pattern Viewer
- Improved Visual Pattern Viewer with Pagination in SPMF 2.66
- Improved user interface in SPMF v.2.66 (part 2)
- Improved user interface in SPMF 2.66
- Academic genealogy
Recent Comments
- Olivia Chen on How to draw subgraphs side-by-side in Latex? (with TIKZ)
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on How to become a well-known researcher?
- SILAS MAZIKU KWIZIGIZYA on How to become a well-known researcher?
- Liev on About the author
- me on Unusual Web traffic and end of the forum.
-
-
Tag cloud
- academia
- ai
- algorithm
- apriori
- article
- artificial intelligence
- association rule
- big data
- cfp
- china
- conference
- data
- data mining
- data science
- episode
- graph
- high utility itemset mining
- icdm
- itemset
- itemset mining
- java
- journal
- latex
- machine learning
- open-source
- open source
- pakdd
- paper
- pattern
- pattern mining
- periodic pattern
- phd
- Research
- researcher
- reviewer
- sequence
- sequential pattern
- sequential pattern mining
- software
- spmf
- udml
- utility mining
- video
- workshop
- writing
Number of visitors:
2,803,428
Tag Archives: reviews
Unethical reviewers in academia (part 3)
Previously, I wrote two blog posts about unethical reviewers in academia (part 1 and part 2). It is not that I like this topic, but today, I will talk again about that. Why? Because, I keep encountering them, unfortunately. It … Continue reading
Posted in Academia
Tagged journal, peer review, review process, reviews, unethical reviewers
Leave a comment
The problem with Short Papers
Today, I will talk briefly about short papers at academic conferences, and the problems that they create (in my opinion). For those who don’t know, several conferences can reject or accept papers as short or full papers. A short paper … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Research
Tagged academia, papers, publisher, research papaers, reviews, short papers
Leave a comment