Archives
Categories
- Academia (91)
- artificial intelligence (35)
- Big data (83)
- Bioinformatics (6)
- cfp (12)
- China (1)
- Chinese posts (1)
- Conference (76)
- Data Mining (189)
- Data science (107)
- Database (2)
- General (43)
- Industry (2)
- Java (12)
- Latex (10)
- Machine Learning (22)
- Mathematics (2)
- open-source (42)
- Other (3)
- Pattern Mining (91)
- Plagiarism (1)
- Programming (17)
- Research (108)
- spmf (59)
- Time series (3)
- Uncategorized (23)
- Utility Mining (23)
- Video (19)
- Website (6)
-
Recent Posts
- The Conference Hotel Booking Scam
- Huge traffic from a botnet looking for datasets
- New version of SPMF: 2.63!
- Upcoming feature of SPMF 2.63: Taxonomy Viewer
- CFP: The OCSA 2025 conference
- Update on SPMF next version: the visual pattern viewer
- CFP: HP4MoDa 2025 @ IEEE BIBM 2025
- An Improved Pattern Viewer
- Computer Science Journals and Conferences with the most withdrawals in 2024
- Unusual Web traffic and end of the forum.
Recent Comments
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on What is a Closed Itemset and Why is it Useful?
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on An Improved Pattern Viewer
- Bairavi Balaguru on What is a Closed Itemset and Why is it Useful?
- Kushal P. Birla on An Improved Pattern Viewer
- Kushal P. Birla on An Improved Pattern Viewer
-
-
Tag cloud
- academia
- ai
- algorithm
- apriori
- article
- artificial intelligence
- association rule
- big data
- cfp
- china
- conference
- data
- data mining
- data science
- episode
- graph
- high utility itemset mining
- icdm
- itemset
- itemset mining
- java
- journal
- latex
- machine learning
- open-source
- open source
- pakdd
- paper
- papers
- pattern mining
- periodic pattern
- phd
- Research
- researcher
- reviewer
- sequence
- sequential pattern
- software
- spmf
- udml
- utility mining
- video
- website
- workshop
- writing
Number of visitors:
2,400,971
Tag Archives: reviews
Unethical reviewers in academia (part 3)
Previously, I wrote two blog posts about unethical reviewers in academia (part 1 and part 2). It is not that I like this topic, but today, I will talk again about that. Why? Because, I keep encountering them, unfortunately. It … Continue reading
Posted in Academia
Tagged journal, peer review, review process, reviews, unethical reviewers
Leave a comment
The problem with Short Papers
Today, I will talk briefly about short papers at academic conferences, and the problems that they create (in my opinion). For those who don’t know, several conferences can reject or accept papers as short or full papers. A short paper … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Research
Tagged academia, papers, publisher, research papaers, reviews, short papers
Leave a comment