Archives
Categories
- Academia (91)
- artificial intelligence (35)
- Big data (83)
- Bioinformatics (7)
- cfp (12)
- China (1)
- Chinese posts (1)
- Conference (77)
- Data Mining (190)
- Data science (107)
- Database (2)
- General (43)
- Industry (2)
- Java (12)
- Latex (12)
- Machine Learning (22)
- Mathematics (2)
- open-source (42)
- Other (4)
- Pattern Mining (93)
- Plagiarism (1)
- Programming (17)
- Research (108)
- spmf (62)
- Time series (3)
- Uncategorized (28)
- Utility Mining (23)
- Video (19)
- Website (6)
-
Recent Posts
- A keynote speaker unable to manage time (180 slides!)
- Merry X-Mas and Happy New year to SPMF users!
- The 1st HP4MoDa workshop was held at BIBM 2025
- Another release of SPMF: v2.64b
- A prototype of an improved GUI for the SPMF pattern mining software
- Upcoming in SPMF 2.64b : The “Pattern Diff Analyzer”
- A new version of SPMF (v2.64, november 2025)!
- GMP: A new algorithm for compressing protein sequences
- A new tool for visualizing algorithms from SPMF
- Fixing the reviewresponse.cls LaTeX Class to Allow Multi-Page Comments
Recent Comments
-
-
Tag cloud
- academia
- ai
- algorithm
- apriori
- article
- artificial intelligence
- association rule
- big data
- cfp
- china
- conference
- data
- data mining
- data science
- graph
- high utility itemset mining
- icdm
- itemset
- itemset mining
- java
- journal
- latex
- machine learning
- open-source
- open source
- pakdd
- paper
- papers
- pattern
- pattern mining
- periodic pattern
- phd
- Research
- researcher
- reviewer
- sequence
- sequential pattern
- software
- spmf
- udml
- utility mining
- video
- website
- workshop
- writing
Number of visitors:
2,552,356
Tag Archives: reviewers
An ethical issue in the Elsevier “International Journal of Hydrogen Energy” ?
Today, I saw something quite incredible in the Elsevier journal “International Journal of Hydrogen Energy“, which you can see in the screen shot below: The authors wrote: As strongly requested by the reviewers, here we cite some references [[35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]] although … Continue reading
How to write answers to reviewers for a journal using LaTeX?
Today, I will explain how to write the answer to reviewers for an academic journal using Latex. The advantage of using Latex instead of a software like Microsoft Word to write answers to reviewers is that it allows using all … Continue reading
Posted in Latex
Tagged academia, answer to reviewers, latex, paper revision, reviewer, reviewers
Leave a comment
How to answer reviewers for a journal paper revision?
Today, I will discuss how to prepare the revision of a journal paper after receiving the editor’s decision that the paper will be accepted with minor or major modifications. As most people should know, when submitting a paper to a … Continue reading