Archives
Categories
- Academia (80)
- artificial intelligence (34)
- Big data (80)
- Bioinformatics (3)
- cfp (10)
- Chinese posts (1)
- Conference (70)
- Data Mining (179)
- Data science (100)
- Database (1)
- General (42)
- Industry (2)
- Interview (1)
- Java (10)
- Latex (10)
- Machine Learning (19)
- Mathematics (2)
- open-source (36)
- Other (3)
- Pattern Mining (82)
- Programming (17)
- Research (109)
- spmf (48)
- Time series (3)
- Uncategorized (23)
- Utility Mining (22)
- Video (19)
- Website (3)
-
Recent Posts
- When ChatGPT is used to write papers…
- Sneak peak at the new user interface of SPMF (part 2)
- Sneak peak at the new user interface of SPMF (part 1)
- UDML 2024 Accepted papers
- SPMF 2.60 is coming soon!
- The importance of using standard terminology in research papers
- UDML 2024 @ PAKDD 2024 (deadline extended)
- Your social network on DBLP as a graph
- Call for papers: UDML 2024 workshop @ PAKDD 2024
- A new survey paper on episode mining!
Recent Comments
- Dr J Gangadhar Naik on How to improve the quality of your research papers?
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on About the author
- Philippe Fournier-Viger on About the author
- K. P. Birla on About the author
- Himanshi on Discovering hidden patterns in texts using SPMF
DSSBA2023
Tag cloud
- academia
- ai
- algorithm
- apriori
- article
- articles
- artificial intelligence
- association rule
- big data
- cfp
- china
- conference
- data
- data mining
- data science
- episode
- graph
- high utility itemset mining
- icdm
- itemset
- itemset mining
- java
- journal
- latex
- machine learning
- open-source
- open source
- pakdd
- paper
- papers
- pattern mining
- periodic pattern
- phd
- Research
- researcher
- reviewer
- sequence
- sequential pattern
- software
- spmf
- udml
- utility mining
- video
- workshop
- writing
Number of visitors:
2,271,450
Tag Archives: reviewer
How to write answers to reviewers for a journal using LaTeX?
Today, I will explain how to write the answer to reviewers for an academic journal using Latex. The advantage of using Latex instead of a software like Microsoft Word to write answers to reviewers is that it allows using all … Continue reading
Posted in Latex
Tagged academia, answer to reviewers, latex, paper revision, reviewer, reviewers
Leave a comment
What I learned from being a journal editor for two years?
For over two years, I have worked as associate editor-in-chief for a major journal published by Springer. For this job, I have handled around 500 papers from all the steps of the review process. Recently, I have decided to stop … Continue reading
How to become a journal or conference reviewer?
Today, I will write a blog post aimed a young researchers, who want to know what is the work of a reviewer in academia, how to become a reviewer of international journals or conferences, and what are the benefits of being a reviewer. What … Continue reading
Unethical Reviewers in Academia!
In this blog post, I will talk about a common problem in academia, which is the unethical behavior of some reviewers that ask authors to cite several of their papers. It is quite common that some reviewer will ask authors to cite his papers to increase his citation count. I have encountered this problem many times … Continue reading
Unethical reviewers in academia
In this blog post, I will discuss about the importance of an ethical review process in academia, and the problem of unethical reviewers. I will share some stories about some unethical reviewers in journals and conferences. Peer review in academia The process of peer review in academia … Continue reading
How to review a research paper?
Today, I will discuss the task of reviewing papers in academia. I will discuss why it is important to review papers, and then give tips about how to review papers and also talk about what a reviewer should do and should not do. This topic is important … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Research
Tagged article, journal article, research paper, review, reviewer
Leave a comment
Conference reviewers procrastinate?
Today, I will write about the work of reviewers for scientific conferences. As you probably know, when a researcher submit a paper to a conference, the paper is assigned to usually three or more reviewers. The program chair of the … Continue reading